Regrets Mischa Tuffield (Wednesday, 19 October)
TriG Gavin Carothers (Wednesday, 19 October)
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Ivan Herman (Wednesday, 19 October)
RDF Collections Andy Seaborne (Wednesday, 19 October)
Close ISSUE-76? David Wood (Tuesday, 18 October)
Dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann (Tuesday, 18 October)
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Alex Hall (Friday, 14 October)
sub-datasets ... Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 14 October)
thx to both hosts Guus Schreiber (Friday, 14 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman (Friday, 14 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Steve Harris (Friday, 14 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley (Friday, 14 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman (Friday, 14 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Sandro Hawke (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ian Davis (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ian Davis (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Sandro Hawke (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Jeremy Carroll (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne (Saturday, 15 October)
- "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Ian Davis (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris (Sunday, 16 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke (Sunday, 16 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris (Sunday, 16 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Pat Hayes (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Pat Hayes (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Andy Seaborne (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Richard Cyganiak (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Richard Cyganiak (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Dan Brickley (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Alex Hall (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Dan Brickley (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ian Davis (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne (Saturday, 15 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pat Hayes (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pat Hayes (Monday, 17 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne (Wednesday, 19 October)
- Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley (Saturday, 15 October)
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Steve Harris (Saturday, 15 October)
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne (Sunday, 16 October)
Agenda suggestion Sandro Hawke (Thursday, 13 October)
Affiliation Change Gavin Carothers (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Leif Halvard Silli (Wednesday, 12 October)
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst (Thursday, 13 October)
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Steve Harris (Friday, 7 October)
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Andy Seaborne (Friday, 7 October)
Regrets Zhe Wu (Wednesday, 5 October)
the word "reasoning" Sandro Hawke (Saturday, 1 October)
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Sandro Hawke (Saturday, 1 October)
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Dan Brickley (Saturday, 1 October)
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes (Monday, 3 October)
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes (Monday, 3 October)
Re: complete graphs Richard Cyganiak (Saturday, 1 October)
Re: complete graphs Andy Seaborne (Saturday, 1 October)
Last message date: Friday, 28 October 2011 09:48:53 UTC