public-rdf-wg@w3.org from October 2011 by date

Friday, 28 October 2011

Re: Blank Node Ordering Andy Seaborne
Re: Blank Node Ordering Steve Harris

Thursday, 27 October 2011

Fwd: Blank Node Ordering David Wood

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Re: Hello all, just joined the WG David Wood

Monday, 24 October 2011

Hello all, just joined the WG Charles Greer
[ALL] Telecon Cancelled This Week David Wood
Important! Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change Ivan Herman

Friday, 21 October 2011

Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Andy Seaborne
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Steve Harris
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Andy Seaborne
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Andy Seaborne
Re: Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Re: Proposed modification to resolution of ISSUE 71: value space of rdf:langString Jeremy Carroll
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Steve Harris
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Antoine Zimmermann
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Ivan Herman
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Sandro Hawke
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Steve Harris
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Dan Brickley
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Dan Brickley
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Sandro Hawke
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Steve Harris
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Ivan Herman
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Dan Brickley
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Steve Harris
Re: sub-datasets ... Yves Raimond
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Dan Brickley
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Steve Harris
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Steve Harris

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Dan Brickley
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Dan Brickley

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Re: Proposed modification to resolution of ISSUE 71: value space of rdf:langString Ivan Herman
Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Ivan Herman
Proposed modification to resolution of ISSUE 71: value space of rdf:langString Jeremy Carroll
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Pat Hayes
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

Re: Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Alex Hall
Re: Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Eric Prud'hommeaux
proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) Sandro Hawke
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Sandro Hawke
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Andy Seaborne
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Andy Seaborne
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Pat Hayes
Re: RDF Collections Pat Hayes
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Pat Hayes
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Pat Hayes
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: sub-datasets ... Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pierre-Antoine Champin
Minutes of 19 October 2011 Gavin Carothers
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Sandro Hawke
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Alex Hall
Re: What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Guus Schreiber
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Dan Brickley
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris
Re: Re: Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Alex Hall
Re: Dataset semantics Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne
Re: Re: Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Ivan Herman
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Andy Seaborne
Re: RDF Collections Sandro Hawke
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Sandro Hawke
RDF Collections Andy Seaborne
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Andy Seaborne
Regrets Thomas Steiner
Re: Regrets Ian Davis
Re: Regrets Yves Raimond
Regrets Mischa Tuffield
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Ivan Herman
Re: sub-datasets ... Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pierre-Antoine Champin
TriG Gavin Carothers
proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

Re: Close ISSUE-76? David Wood
Re: Close ISSUE-76? Pat Hayes
[ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19 Guus Schreiber
Re: Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Andy Seaborne
Able to Edit RDF/XML? David Wood
Co-editor on RDF 1.1 Vocabulary? David Wood
Close ISSUE-76? David Wood
Dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Scope of blank nodes in SPARQL? Alex Hall

Monday, 17 October 2011

Fw: W3C Workshop on Linked Enterprise Data Patterns: Data-driven Applications on the Web (Call for Participation) Arnaud Le Hors
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Richard Cyganiak
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Dan Brickley
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Steve Harris
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Richard Cyganiak
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Richard Cyganiak
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Steve Harris
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Richard Cyganiak
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Andy Seaborne
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Steve Harris
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Pat Hayes
Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Pat Hayes
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pat Hayes
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Pat Hayes

Sunday, 16 October 2011

Friday, 14 October 2011

RE: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Phillips, Addison

Saturday, 15 October 2011

Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ian Davis
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ian Davis
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ian Davis

Sunday, 16 October 2011

Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 15 October 2011

Re: "Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Ian Davis
"Simple Lists" (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) Sandro Hawke
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Jeremy Carroll
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Sandro Hawke
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Sandro Hawke
Re: sub-datasets ... Sandro Hawke
Re: What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Gavin Carothers
Re: What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Sandro Hawke
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Sandro Hawke

Friday, 14 October 2011

Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Dan Brickley
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Jeremy Carroll
Re: test cases - sketches Pierre-Antoine Champin
What is really a graph container? Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: Dilbert example - defining hasCubicle Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Andy Seaborne
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Alex Hall
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Alex Hall
Re: Dilbert example - defining hasCubicle David Wood
Re: Dilbert example - defining hasCubicle Alex Hall
modeling SPARQL update - a GRAPHS challenge (test case?) Sandro Hawke
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Andy Seaborne
Re: Contexts of use, a semantic idea Andy Seaborne
Re: RDF-ISSUE-78 (Doc-datasets): Document Convention for Using Datasets [RDF Primer] Ian Davis
Re: RDF-ISSUE-78 (Doc-datasets): Document Convention for Using Datasets [RDF Primer] Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Andy Seaborne
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Ian Davis
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Dan Brickley
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? William Waites
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Steve Harris
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics William Waites
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Ian Davis
Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Steve Harris
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Steve Harris
Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG? William Waites
Scope of blank nodes in TriG? Ian Davis
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Dan Brickley

Friday, 14 October 2011

Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) Ivan Herman
Re: Contexts of use, a semantic idea Pat Hayes
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Dilbert example - defining hasCubicle David Wood
sub-datasets ... Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pat Hayes
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: thx to both hosts David Wood
thx to both hosts Guus Schreiber
Re: Possible named graph issue David Wood
RDF-ISSUE-78 (Doc-datasets): Document Convention for Using Datasets [RDF Primer] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Possible named graph issue Dan Brickley

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Jeremy Carroll
Possible named graph issue Ian Davis
Re: Dilbert example - defining hasCubicle Jeremy Carroll
ISSUE-25 Talis Position Ian Davis
ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
Dilbert example - defining hasCubicle Dan Brickley
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Dan Brickley
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Pat Hayes
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Sandro Hawke
Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Pat Hayes
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Pat Hayes
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Pat Hayes
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Ian Davis
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Richard Cyganiak
Re: Strawpoll proposals on terminology Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Ian Davis
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Richard Cyganiak
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE 71 Language-typed literals Richard Cyganiak
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Richard Cyganiak
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Strawpoll proposals on terminology Andy Seaborne
Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics Richard Cyganiak
Re: Strawpoll proposals on terminology Richard Cyganiak
Proposed resolution for ISSUE 71 Language-typed literals Schreiber, A.T.
Agenda suggestion Sandro Hawke
Re: Contexts of use, a semantic idea Andy Seaborne
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Ian Davis
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? William Waites
Re: <sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Ian Davis
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

RE: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Re: [Moderator Action] Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Leif Halvard Silli
RE: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Phillips, Addison

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Phillips, Addison
RE: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Phillips, Addison
RE: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Phillips, Addison

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Contexts of use, a semantic idea Pat Hayes
<sandro> PatHayes, can you formally define g-box for us? Pat Hayes
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pat Hayes
Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Pat Hayes
Re: Strawpoll proposals on terminology Pat Hayes
Re: Strawpoll proposals on terminology Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Defining graphs with RDF Ian Davis
Strawpoll proposals on terminology Ian Davis
more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Sandro Hawke
test cases - sketches Dan Brickley
Re: [Admin] use of email addresses Jeremy Carroll
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Pat Hayes
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Alex Hall
(no subject) Andy Seaborne
Re: [Admin] use of email addresses David Wood
Re: [Admin] use of email addresses Ivan Herman
Re: [Admin] use of email addresses Ian Davis
[Admin] use of email addresses Ivan Herman
Re: [ALL] FTF2 Attendance Matteo Brunati
Re: "options" -- an enumeration of the "graphs" design space Pat Hayes
Re: phoning into F2F? Ivan Herman
Re: The "Rolling Snapshots" Pattern and Vocabulary Ivan Herman
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Pat Hayes
phoning into F2F? Pat Hayes
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Pat Hayes
Re: Drfit .... ancient minutes Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Jeremy Carroll
Drfit .... ancient minutes Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Jeremy Carroll
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Jeremy Carroll
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts David Wood
"options" -- an enumeration of the "graphs" design space Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) David Wood

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Provenance Data Model FPWD Steve Harris
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts David Wood
Re: Provenance Data Model FPWD David Wood
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts David Wood
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Jeremy Carroll
Re: Provenance Data Model FPWD Steve Harris
Provenance Data Model FPWD David Wood
Re: Time-varying g-boxes : a dataset pattern David Wood
Re: Time-varying g-boxes : a dataset pattern Andy Seaborne
Re: Time-varying g-boxes : a dataset pattern Sandro Hawke
The "Rolling Snapshots" Pattern and Vocabulary Sandro Hawke
Semantic Web Meetup *tonight* at MIT Sandro Hawke
Re: Time-varying g-boxes : a dataset pattern David Wood
Re: Affiliation Change David Wood
Time-varying g-boxes : a dataset pattern Andy Seaborne
Re: Affiliation Change Ivan Herman
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst

Monday, 10 October 2011

Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts John Cowan
RE: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Phillips, Addison

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Sandro Hawke
Affiliation Change Gavin Carothers

Monday, 10 October 2011

Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Jeremy Carroll
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Dan Brickley
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Pat Hayes
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Pat Hayes
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts David Wood
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Alex Hall
[GRAPH] RDF WG Issues Relating to the Graph TF David Wood
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases David Wood
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Steve Harris
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Andy Seaborne
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Alex Hall
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Sandro Hawke
[MIT Attendees] Breakfast before FTF2 David Wood
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Sandro Hawke
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Eric Prud'hommeaux
[ALL] FTF2 Attendance David Wood
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Steve Harris
Re: Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Ivan Herman
Web Semantics of Datasets (v0.2) Sandro Hawke
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Andy Seaborne
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Martin J. Dürst
Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts Jeremy Carroll
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
RDFa 1.1 and plain literals Manu Sporny
Re: RDF Concepts - bad reference? Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 9 October 2011

RDF Concepts - bad reference? Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 8 October 2011

Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Andy Seaborne
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Andy Seaborne
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes

Friday, 7 October 2011

Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Richard Cyganiak
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Richard Cyganiak
Re: Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Richard Cyganiak
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Steve Harris
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Ian Davis
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Ian Davis
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Richard Cyganiak
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Andy Seaborne
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Ivan Herman
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Andy Seaborne
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Ian Davis
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Steve Harris
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Dan Brickley
Re: Web Semantics for Datasets Ivan Herman
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Web Semantics for Datasets Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 6 October 2011

Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Alex Hall
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Richard Cyganiak
RE: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Ian Davis

Thursday, 6 October 2011

Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Lee Feigenbaum
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Steve Harris
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Andy Seaborne
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Steve Harris
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Andy Seaborne
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Steve Harris
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Yves Raimond
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Ivan Herman
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Andy Seaborne
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Pat Hayes
[ALL] Scribes List Updated David Wood
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Pat Hayes
Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases Andy Seaborne
[ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases David Wood
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Steve Harris
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Sandro Hawke
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Sandro Hawke
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Sandro Hawke
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Richard Cyganiak
Regrets Zhe Wu
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Steve Harris
Re: complete graphs William Waites
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Ian Davis
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. Andy Seaborne
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Sandro Hawke
Re: Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: [Turtle] in HTML Ivan Herman
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin

Saturday, 1 October 2011

Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal Ian Davis

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

Graph labels vs. graph names. (was: Re: complete graphs) Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

[ALL] Agenda for 5 Oct 2011 David Wood
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Ian Davis
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: complete graphs Richard Cyganiak
Re: complete graphs Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Sandro Hawke
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: complete graphs William Waites

Monday, 3 October 2011

Re: today's minutes available Arnaud Le Hors
Re: On Graph is in Turtle (was Re: today's minutes available) Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Admin : comments lists Ivan Herman
Re: complete graphs Pat Hayes
Re: complete graphs Pat Hayes
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pat Hayes

Sunday, 2 October 2011

Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal Andy Seaborne
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal Lee Feigenbaum
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: the word "reasoning" Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak

Saturday, 1 October 2011

Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Dan Brickley
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Sandro Hawke
Re: complete graphs Sandro Hawke
the word "reasoning" Sandro Hawke
Re: complete graphs Andy Seaborne
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal Richard Cyganiak
Re: complete graphs Richard Cyganiak
Re: complete graphs Richard Cyganiak

Last message date: Friday, 28 October 2011 09:48:53 UTC