- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:47:32 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 06/10/11 10:29, Steve Harris wrote: > On 2011-10-06, at 08:35, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> On 05/10/11 23:16, Ian Davis wrote: >>> I think 4.2 web crawling (or aggregation in general) is very >>> important >>> >>> Also I don't see it on the existing list but being able to edit >>> datasets at the granularity of the graph rather than the triple >>> is very important. i.e. It is very convenient to be able to >>> replace all the triples in one named graph with a new set when >>> doing things like web crawling. >> >> Agreed. >> >> Some words added (section 1.7, to keep the numbering stable); Ian, >> do feel free to refine them. >> >> This relates to 1.5 "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores". > > Agreed, on all counts. > > However I'd like it to be expanded in scope slightly to also cover > information derived from non-RDF pages which are being crawled (pure > self-interest, as this is where we get most of our data). It's > slightly different from a modelling point of view, as foo.html > doesn't typically contain any actual triples, just information which > cause triples to be asserted. It's a wiki ... :-) > That, in combination with “1.3 Graph Changes Over Time”, and “1.5 > Exchanging the contents of RDF stores” captures our most challenging > data representation challenges. > > - Steve > > >>> On 5 Oct 2011, at 20:49, Andy >>> Seaborne<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I think that: >>>> >>>> 1.3 Graph Changes Over Time >>>> >>>> is also important. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> On 05/10/11 19:56, David Wood wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> We would like to prioritize the use cases for named graphs >>>>> [1] before FTF2. >>>>> >>>>> At today's telecon, the following use cases were deemed >>>>> important to attendees: - 1.1 Slicing datasets according to >>>>> multiple dimensions - 1.5 Exchanging the contents of RDF >>>>> stores - 1.6 Versioning in SDMX and DDI - 5.2 OWL's “Ontology >>>>> Documents” - 6.2 Reasoning over annotations >>>>> >>>>> Further, it was proposed to drop the following use case: - >>>>> 4.8 Provenance Information and Data Retention ...and add >>>>> Sandro's provenance use case [2] in place of several existing >>>>> provenance use cases (to be determined). >>>>> >>>>> Please note that the numbers are for reference only until the >>>>> page is modified. The numbers *will* change, no later than >>>>> Friday. The numbers in this message are from revision 1473 >>>>> [3]. >>>>> >>>>> If you object to these changes or have others to suggest, >>>>> please respond to this message and/or update the wiki. >>>>> Thanks. I will update the wiki no later than this weekend >>>>> prior to the ftf. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Dave >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC [2] >>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0003.html >>>>> >>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=TF-Graphs-UC&oldid73 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 09:48:11 UTC