- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:55:56 +0100
- To: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-prov@w3.org, Peter Buneman <opb@inf.ed.ac.uk>
On 4 Oct 2011, at 12:03, William Waites wrote: > What if we *did* have names for assertions? We could construct graphs > (collections of assertions) using these names... If we interpreted the > fourth column in this way, what would happen? There was a looong conversation between me an Bob Ferris on public-rdf-comments about exactly this question, starting here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2011Sep/0005.html You might want to read it and let us know if you reach a different conclusion Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 15:56:29 UTC