- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:29:43 -0400
- To: <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> Subject: Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:16:33 -0500 > On 12 Oct 2011, at 22:04, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> 1. If a system successfully dereferences URL "L" and obtains a >> representation of an RDF graph, then <L> is a GraphContainer. That >> is, "L" denotes a GraphContainer. Logically, GraphContainer is >> disjoint from foaf:Person (I think!!) so a document that includes "<> >> a foaf:Person" is (by this proposal) logically inconsistent with it >> being served on the Web. > > This seems a logical consequence from httpRange-14. I don't read this in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html Maybe it comes from http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ section 2.2 as well, although I find the world view in that section to be somewhat muddled. In particular, there is a distinction between a web document (that may have a physical existence) and the non-physical information resource that is not well explained there. [...] > Richard peter
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 11:30:46 UTC