- From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:16:27 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 22:16:55 UTC
RDF is famously the technology that allows anyone to say anything about anything :) I have been wondering whether it is even necessary to include more graph mechanics at the RDF level or whether to leave it to SPARQL-future to define. But it seems obvious that there is something missing from RDF if we cannot even answer the following question: Given an RDF Graph G how can I refer to the exact set of triples G contains using RDF? At the very least we need to be able to answer this question in this WG. -- Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd. http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 22:16:55 UTC