- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:21:34 +0200
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 20 October 2011 13:13, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > I wouldn't be comfortable with marking Seq as "archaic" or similar unless there's a viable alternative, and I don't think List counts. Me neither. Nor "quaint", "twee", "retro" or "regrettable". It's just what it is, with no great mystery or confusion. Dan
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 11:22:12 UTC