Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77)

On 20 October 2011 13:13, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't be comfortable with marking Seq as "archaic" or similar unless there's a viable alternative, and I don't think List counts.

Me neither.  Nor "quaint", "twee", "retro" or "regrettable". It's just
what it is, with no great mystery or confusion.

Dan

Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 11:22:12 UTC