Re: Graph labels vs. graph names.

On 10/5/2011 2:52 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:

On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

>> >  Why is a semantic condition that makes :G2 denote the graph important, while a semantic condition that makes RDF Semantics aware of the web is unimportant?
> Because we want to make some RDF machinery work in a way that needs one 'naming' to be fixed, but not the other.
>

Of course both of these are incredibly important, however one is very 
very hard, involving TAG level stuff and almost all WGs at W3C, the 
other is entirely in scope for this WG. I feel that we should make the 
change we can to clarify the new work we are doing.

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 01:12:09 UTC