- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:53:45 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 12:52:19 UTC
On Oct 19, 2011, at 14:17 , Sandro Hawke wrote: <snip> > > Oh, yeah, I'd also *love* to stop using the terms "collections" and > "containers" and just use "Seq" and "List". I know "Collection" is > hard-coded into RDF/XML, but still. Expecting people to remember > container=Seq and collection=List is a bit ... rude. I always mix them up, that is for sure... > Especially if > we're calling g-boxes "Graph Containers", which I've already seen one of > us mis-write as "RDF Container". Ehem. That was me...:-) Yeah, if we clean up the terminology, that should be done, too. And the Seq/Alt/Bag terms (rdf:_x, rdf:Membership..., etc) should probably be removed from the basic inference vocabulary, too (which would simplify the usage of the semantics, too) Ivan > > -- Sandro > >> Andy >> >> > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 12:52:19 UTC