W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG?

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:38:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4E98ABE2.6040205@topquadrant.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org



RDF is a framework for describing resources.
If I use the same blank node in two graphs, how is the description of 
the resources modified?

i.e. what is the semantic difference?

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 21:39:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Brickley: "Re: Datasets and contextual/temporal semantics"
Previous message: Pierre-Antoine Champin: "Re: test cases - sketches"
In reply to: Andy Seaborne: "Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG?"
Next in thread: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG?"
Reply: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:01 UTC