- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:03:29 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <503A5FBA-0E2D-4DE5-A31F-7E3CF9EFD832@w3.org>
I can certainly live with that. I would not mind labeling it as a compatibility feature, too, that sounds like a much more gentle term (public relation wise) than archaic. Ivan On Oct 19, 2011, at 02:44 , Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 21:05 +0200, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> Maybe we should have resolved at the FTF to skip a week after all the >> hard work at the FTF, but we didn't, so here is the agenda: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.10.19 >> >> I suggest a short meeting, basically reviewing the FTF minutes, with >> some reflections, plsy tackling two detailed issues. > > The second of those is ISSUE-77. To sum up the discussion on the > mailing list, I think our best chance for consensus is on this > resolution: > > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-77 with a plan to keep rdf:Seq and RDF Collections > as in 2004 (syntax, no semantics), but include non-normative text in one > or more of our documents gently steering people toward best practices, > which are (1) try to model without using either one, when feasible, and > (2) if you need to use one, use RDF Collections structured so they can > be serialized losslessly in Turtle using the "(...)" notation. > > This proposal is trying to split the difference: some people (including > me) think it would be better to say something stronger (I'd like to > deprecate Seq, or at least label it merely a "compatibility feature"); > some people want something weaker (like do nothing). My sense from what > people have posted is that everyone can live with this middle ground. > > -- Sandro > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 09:02:03 UTC