W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 12:27:07 +0100
Cc: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <17E0B540-0C36-4DD9-BA4D-A035B3F26395@cyganiak.de>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>

On 30 Sep 2011, at 14:17, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> But do you have a use case that would be solved by a dataset with
> default graph, that a dataset *without* default graph would *not* solve?

Backing up the contents of a SPARQL store as a dump, and loading it into a different SPARQL store.

Best,
Richard

Received on Saturday, 1 October 2011 11:27:50 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: why I don't like named graph IRIs in the DATASET proposal"
Previous message: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: complete graphs"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Ian Davis: "Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal"
Reply: Ian Davis: "Re: why I don't like default graphs in the DATASET proposal"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:01 UTC