W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:00:05 -0400
Message-Id: <B2784A2C-E0B0-44B7-838D-A5C3D49C7942@3roundstones.com>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>

On Oct 11, 2011, at 16:49, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote:

>>> B)
>>> 2) drop the "SHOULD use NFC" requirement on literals
>> I'm good with this one, unless we decide to do something around our ISSUE-63:
>>  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/63
> For reasons I just outlined, I think this would be a mistake. By avoiding denormalized text, RDF users can help ensure interoperability. In practice, this is a no-op for implementers.

Why do you see it as a noop?


> Addison
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 21:00:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:09 UTC