Re: Unicode NFC - status, and RDF Concepts

On Oct 11, 2011, at 16:49, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote:

>>> B)
>>> 2) drop the "SHOULD use NFC" requirement on literals
>> 
>> I'm good with this one, unless we decide to do something around our ISSUE-63:
>>  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/63
>> 
> 
> For reasons I just outlined, I think this would be a mistake. By avoiding denormalized text, RDF users can help ensure interoperability. In practice, this is a no-op for implementers.

Why do you see it as a noop?

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Addison

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 21:00:46 UTC