- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:00:05 -0400
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Oct 11, 2011, at 16:49, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote: >>> B) >>> 2) drop the "SHOULD use NFC" requirement on literals >> >> I'm good with this one, unless we decide to do something around our ISSUE-63: >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/63 >> > > For reasons I just outlined, I think this would be a mistake. By avoiding denormalized text, RDF users can help ensure interoperability. In practice, this is a no-op for implementers. Why do you see it as a noop? Regards, Dave > > Addison
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 21:00:46 UTC