W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Possible named graph issue

From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAiX05GqTZaAC-FeQCBCmU7GQfcgDfjesKuDZbyQVq-nWio8Ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
We got consensus on this strawpoll:

STRAWPOLL: The WG will non-normatively document one particular convention
for using datasets, where in <u,G> the URI denotes+awww:identifies a graph
container and G is the state of the container.

Should we turn this into an tracked issue?

Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd.
http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 18:17:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:09 UTC