Re: more about dereference (notes from MIT post F2F2-day-1)

On 13 Oct 2011, at 12:29, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> 1. If a system successfully dereferences URL "L" and obtains a
>>> representation of an RDF graph, then <L> is a GraphContainer.  That
>>> is, "L" denotes a GraphContainer.  Logically, GraphContainer is
>>> disjoint from foaf:Person (I think!!) so a document that includes "<>
>>> a foaf:Person" is (by this proposal) logically inconsistent with it
>>> being served on the Web.
>> 
>> This seems a logical consequence from httpRange-14.
> 
> I don't read this in 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html
> 
> Maybe it comes from http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ section 2.2 as well,

Yes, you are right.

> although I find the world view in that section to be somewhat muddled. 

Most certainly.

> It is also very likely that some will not be consistent with this axiom,
> so putting this theory in any privileged place is problematic.

I agree.

Best,
Richard