- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:37:05 +0100
- To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <sandro@w3.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 13 Oct 2011, at 12:29, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> 1. If a system successfully dereferences URL "L" and obtains a >>> representation of an RDF graph, then <L> is a GraphContainer. That >>> is, "L" denotes a GraphContainer. Logically, GraphContainer is >>> disjoint from foaf:Person (I think!!) so a document that includes "<> >>> a foaf:Person" is (by this proposal) logically inconsistent with it >>> being served on the Web. >> >> This seems a logical consequence from httpRange-14. > > I don't read this in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html > > Maybe it comes from http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ section 2.2 as well, Yes, you are right. > although I find the world view in that section to be somewhat muddled. Most certainly. > It is also very likely that some will not be consistent with this axiom, > so putting this theory in any privileged place is problematic. I agree. Best, Richard
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 11:37:39 UTC