- From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:25:01 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 17:25:34 UTC
Just to clarify our position on deprecating/marking archaic reification i distinguish between: reification mechanics, of which an example is http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#section-Reification and reification vocabulary as defined by http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_reificationvocab Talis uses the vocabulary in its changeset vocabulary which is used in almost every system and application we operate and is exposed in public web APIs. We are ok with marking the mechanics as archaic but we won't support that for the vocabulary. We're happy for the vocabulary to remain without defined semantics. -- Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd. http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 17:25:34 UTC