Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)

On 15 October 2011 11:01, Ian Davis <id@talis.com> wrote:
> FWIW I find the term archaic slightly derogatory.

I've used it in FOAF since it doesn't offend me as editor of FOAF
spec; and as for instance data publishers, I think it has about the
right level of unsettlingness about it. But I'm curious if it is also
derogatory to publishers of data that use the old-fashioned terms.
That wouldn't be so nice...

Dan

Received on Saturday, 15 October 2011 10:13:22 UTC