- From: Ian Davis <id@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:16:58 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I think 4.2 web crawling (or aggregation in general) is very important Also I don't see it on the existing list but being able to edit datasets at the granularity of the graph rather than the triple is very important. i.e. It is very convenient to be able to replace all the triples in one named graph with a new set when doing things like web crawling. On 5 Oct 2011, at 20:49, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > I think that: > > 1.3 Graph Changes Over Time > > is also important. > > Andy > > On 05/10/11 19:56, David Wood wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We would like to prioritize the use cases for named graphs [1] before FTF2. >> >> At today's telecon, the following use cases were deemed important to attendees: >> - 1.1 Slicing datasets according to multiple dimensions >> - 1.5 Exchanging the contents of RDF stores >> - 1.6 Versioning in SDMX and DDI >> - 5.2 OWL's “Ontology Documents” >> - 6.2 Reasoning over annotations >> >> Further, it was proposed to drop the following use case: >> - 4.8 Provenance Information and Data Retention >> ...and add Sandro's provenance use case [2] in place of several existing provenance use cases (to be determined). >> >> Please note that the numbers are for reference only until the page is modified. The numbers *will* change, no later than Friday. The numbers in this message are from revision 1473 [3]. >> >> If you object to these changes or have others to suggest, please respond to this message and/or update the wiki. Thanks. I will update the wiki no later than this weekend prior to the ftf. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0003.html >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=TF-Graphs-UC&oldid73 >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 12:54:29 UTC