- From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:13:55 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > Clarification request: > > What is the status of documenting other conventions, e.g. the form in the > original named graph paper where <URI, graph> is URI naming a g-snap > (required for the time varying g-boxes, which I belive contains zero new > ideas, only uses existing ones). > We didn't achieve consensus on anything other than the text in ISSUE-78 and that was only after a lot of circling. I'm not averse to documenting it, but forming consensus was difficult so I suspect it won't be easy to get people to agree any text documenting further conventions. -- Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd. http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 12:14:37 UTC