W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Scope of blank nodes in TriG?

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:17:41 +0100
Cc: ian.davis@talis.com, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <9963F886-A133-40A2-A4D9-8DF0C6634F31@garlik.com>
To: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
On 2011-10-14, at 12:12, William Waites wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:57:43 +0100, Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com> said:
>    iand> I think  it does matter. What was the N-Quads document that
>    iand> was thew result of the conversion.
> I just looked up the mime type for trig, and did it directly with the
> same results. The reason I thought it wouldn't matter is because I
> suspected (correctly) that both documents would get parsed into the
> same internal represenatation by raptor which is what actually gets
> put into the store.

Somewhat off topic, but from memory I don't think that's correct.

I think Trig generates graph change callbacks, and N-Quads emits quads.

4store (apparently) treats them the same, but it doesn't have to.

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 11:18:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:09 UTC