- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:28:59 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Steve, Dan Would you be ready to at least remove them from the core RDFS semanitcs, ie, the entailments? Ivan ---- Ivan Herman web: http://www.ivan-herman.net mobile: +31 64 1044 153 On 20 Oct 2011, at 13:21, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On 20 October 2011 13:13, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: >> I wouldn't be comfortable with marking Seq as "archaic" or similar unless there's a viable alternative, and I don't think List counts. > > Me neither. Nor "quaint", "twee", "retro" or "regrettable". It's just > what it is, with no great mystery or confusion. > > Dan
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 12:29:46 UTC