- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:50:04 -0700
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
+1 Issues to do with time are not just SemWeb issues, but Web Architectural issues, see http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#representation-reuse This problem is really orthogonal to that of a framework for describing resources, and more an issue to do with URIs. Jeremy On 10/10/2011 2:56 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > [snip] > > I share these concerns. Time is important but it will be fiendishly > hard to formalise anything. Also note that these issues afflict many > of our basic building blocks. For eg, OWL InverseFunctionalProperty. > We might imagine a strictly static version or one that allowed the > property to take different values at different times, each truthful in > its time. Or a half-dozen subtle variations. Devilish details to > fornalise and many existing Rdf/owl properties have specs that don't > give any clue what (if anything) their authors thought on this point. > > For an EU project --- fun stuff > > For a Web standard --- we're not ready to go there > > Dan
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 23:50:27 UTC