Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases

On 05/10/11 23:16, Ian Davis wrote:
> I think 4.2 web crawling (or aggregation in general) is very important
>
> Also I don't see it on the existing list but being able to edit
> datasets at the granularity of the graph rather than the triple is
> very important. i.e. It is very convenient to be able to replace all
> the triples in one named graph with a new set when doing things like
> web crawling.

Agreed.

Some words added (section 1.7, to keep the numbering stable); Ian, do 
feel free to refine them.

This relates to 1.5 "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores".

	Andy
>
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2011, at 20:49, Andy Seaborne<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>  wrote:
>
>> I think that:
>>
>> 1.3 Graph Changes Over Time
>>
>> is also important.
>>
>>     Andy
>>
>> On 05/10/11 19:56, David Wood wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We would like to prioritize the use cases for named graphs [1] before FTF2.
>>>
>>> At today's telecon, the following use cases were deemed important to attendees:
>>> - 1.1 Slicing datasets according to multiple dimensions
>>> - 1.5 Exchanging the contents of RDF stores
>>> - 1.6 Versioning in SDMX and DDI
>>> - 5.2 OWL's “Ontology Documents”
>>> - 6.2 Reasoning over annotations
>>>
>>> Further, it was proposed to drop the following use case:
>>> - 4.8 Provenance Information and Data Retention
>>> ...and add Sandro's provenance use case [2] in place of several existing provenance use cases (to be determined).
>>>
>>> Please note that the numbers are for reference only until the page is modified.  The numbers *will* change, no later than Friday.  The numbers in this message are from revision 1473 [3].
>>>
>>> If you object to these changes or have others to suggest, please respond to this message and/or update the wiki.  Thanks.  I will update the wiki no later than this weekend prior to the ftf.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC
>>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0003.html
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=TF-Graphs-UC&oldid73
>>>
>>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 07:35:47 UTC