- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:03:55 +0200
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-prov@w3.org, Peter Buneman <opb@inf.ed.ac.uk>
>>>>> "phayes" == Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> writes:
phayes> I dont think we have names for assertions. An assertion is a
phayes> speech act, not a graph.
[wielding can opener]
What if we *did* have names for assertions? We could construct graphs
(collections of assertions) using these names... If we interpreted the
fourth column in this way, what would happen?
Cheers,
-w
--
William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org>
http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org>
F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 11:04:28 UTC