- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:55:11 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I am ok with prop. 2 on labeling seq to something like archaic but using another term. Note, however, that XMP uses Alt, too, not only Seq, ie, the same treatment should be applied to all containers... Ivan ---- Ivan Herman web: http://www.ivan-herman.net mobile: +31 64 1044 153 On 19 Oct 2011, at 23:20, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > In today's telecon, we seemed to have a rough consensus on how to > proceed with Seq and List, but still needed to hammer out some wording > of proposals. I've created a wiki page with proposals on four > different bits of this. Please feel free to improve the background > text and the proposals. If you want to significantly change the > proposal (instead of just improving the wording), then please add a > different proposal next to the existing one(s). > > On the last one (whether or not to actually mark Seq as archaic), I'm > not hearing anyone ready to formally object to either option, so I'm > thinking a preference vote might be in order. > > The page: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Ordered > > -- Sandro > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 07:55:53 UTC