Re: Possible named graph issue from David Wood on 2011-10-14 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from October 2011)

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:23:37 -0400
To: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3EE927E8-A36F-4743-89CC-6B1112C12703@3roundstones.com>

ISSUE-78
  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/78

Regards,
Dave


On Oct 13, 2011, at 14:16, Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com> wrote:

> We got consensus on this strawpoll:
> 
> STRAWPOLL: The WG will non-normatively document one particular convention for using datasets, where in <u,G> the URI denotes+awww:identifies a graph container and G is the state of the container.
> 
> Should we turn this into an tracked issue?
> 
> -- 
> Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd.
> http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297

Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 00:24:13 UTC