w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from January to March 2005 by date

Tuesday, 29 March 2005

• Minutes for WebDAV WG meeting March 10 2005 Lisa Dusseault

Saturday, 26 March 2005

• Hello, I am new here 王栋

Saturday, 19 March 2005

• Re: Review of quota-06 Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Working group moving forward? Julian Reschke
• Re: Review of quota-06 Julian Reschke
• RE: Review of quota-06 Jim Whitehead

Friday, 18 March 2005

• Re: Summary of "working group meeting", was: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Elias Sinderson
• Re: Review of quota-06 Julian Reschke
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" Jim Luther
• RE: Review of quota-06 Jim Whitehead

Thursday, 17 March 2005

• Moving forward on BIND Jim Whitehead
• RE: Working group moving forward? Jim Whitehead
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" Julian Reschke
• Working group moving forward? Joe Hildebrand
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" Julian Reschke
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" Julian Reschke
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" Lisa Dusseault
• RE: Summary of "working group meeting" Jim Whitehead

Tuesday, 15 March 2005

• Summary of "working group meeting", was: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 8 March 2005

• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Julian Reschke
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Elias Sinderson
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Julian Reschke
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Order of dead properties Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Order of dead properties Julian Reschke
• Re: Order of dead properties Julian Reschke
• Re: Order of dead properties Lisa Dusseault
• Order of dead properties Heiko.Weber@softwareag.com
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Julian Reschke
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Lisa Dusseault

Monday, 7 March 2005

• Fwd: IESG Document Review Process Update Lisa Dusseault
• Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA Julian Reschke
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Julian Reschke
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 5 March 2005

• Re: Meeting in Minneapolis Julian Reschke

Friday, 4 March 2005

• Re: Question on WebDAV usage from Web Parvathi K
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Julian Reschke
• Re: Content encoding and MS Word ... Julian Reschke
• Re: Question on WebDAV usage from Web Julian Reschke

Thursday, 3 March 2005

• Question on WebDAV usage from Web Parvathi K

Sunday, 27 February 2005

• Idempotency in RFC3648, was: WebDav methods and idempotency Julian Reschke

Saturday, 26 February 2005

• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Julian Reschke
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Mark Nottingham
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Julian Reschke
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Lisa Dusseault

Friday, 25 February 2005

• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Mark Nottingham
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Julian Reschke
• [Bug 80] New: Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Mark Baker
• WebDav methods and idempotency Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 24 February 2005

• [Bug 79] New: PUT for collections rationale bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu

Wednesday, 23 February 2005

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Mark Baker

Tuesday, 22 February 2005

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Mark Baker
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Bernard Desruisseaux
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Mark Baker
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 21 February 2005

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke

Saturday, 19 February 2005

• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Julian Reschke

Friday, 18 February 2005

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Lisa Dusseault
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Stefan Eissing
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 Geoffrey M Clemm

Thursday, 17 February 2005

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding
• RE: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Jim Whitehead
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Helge Hess
• RE: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Jim Whitehead
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Lisa Dusseault
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Helge Hess
• RE: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Jim Whitehead
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: Question about DAV:getlastmodified property Lisa Dusseault
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Lisa Dusseault
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Stefan Eissing
• Re: Question about DAV:getlastmodified property Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Stefan Eissing
• Question about DAV:getlastmodified property Heiko.Weber@softwareag.com
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Yves Lafon
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Stefan Eissing
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Stefan Eissing
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Geoffrey M Clemm
• Content encoding and MS Word ... Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 16 February 2005

• draft-reschke-webdav-locking-07, was: State of a lock Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke
• RE: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Jim Whitehead

Tuesday, 15 February 2005

• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Roy T. Fielding
• [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] Julian Reschke

Sunday, 13 February 2005

• Re: State of a lock Geoffrey M Clemm
• State of a lock Julian Reschke

Friday, 11 February 2005

• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Brian Korver

Thursday, 10 February 2005

• Re: Defining extensions for the "Expect" header Julian Reschke
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Julian Reschke
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-11.txt Julian Reschke
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• Review of quota-06, Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-06.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 9 February 2005

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-06.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Tuesday, 8 February 2005

• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Stefan Eissing

Monday, 7 February 2005

• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Brian Korver
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Brian Korver

Sunday, 6 February 2005

• [Bug 74] Remove UUID generation instructions bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: [Bug 74] New: Remove UUID generation instructions Julian Reschke

Friday, 4 February 2005

• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Julian Reschke
• Re: BIND and access control lists Julian Reschke
• Re: BIND and access control lists Julian Reschke
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: BIND and access control lists Lisa Dusseault

Thursday, 3 February 2005

• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: BIND and access control lists Julian Reschke
• Re: BIND and access control lists Lisa Dusseault
• Re: BIND and access control lists Lisa Dusseault
• [Bug 76] What event does creationdate refer to bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND Lisa Dusseault
• [Bug 77] Do Bind operations change the getlastmodified or getetag property values bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 78] New: Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 77] New: Do Bind operations change the getlastmodified or getetag property values bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 76] New: What event does creationdate refer to bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: BIND and access control lists Julian Reschke
• Re: BIND and access control lists Geoffrey M Clemm
• BIND and access control lists Joe Hildebrand
• Status of working group last call on BIND Joe Hildebrand

Wednesday, 2 February 2005

• Re: WG last call on BIND Elias Sinderson
• Re: WG last call on BIND Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? John Baumgarten
• WG last call on BIND Julian Reschke
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? Julian Reschke
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? John Baumgarten
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? Julian Reschke
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? John Baumgarten
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? Julian Reschke
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? John Baumgarten

Monday, 31 January 2005

• On clarification text in specifications Jim Whitehead
• Re: Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) Julian Reschke
• Re: Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) Geoffrey M Clemm

Sunday, 30 January 2005

• Re: Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) Joe Hildebrand
• [Bug 74] New: Remove UUID generation instructions bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 72] Review references section bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu

Saturday, 29 January 2005

• Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? Julian Reschke
• Re: Clarifying text and spec completeness Ted Hardie
• Re: Clarifying text and spec completeness Roy T. Fielding
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? John Reese

Friday, 28 January 2005

• Re: Clarifying text and spec completeness Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Clarifying text and spec completeness Ted Hardie
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Microsoft releases a WebFolder client update, available for all platforms Julian Reschke
• Re: Fwd: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• Fwd: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault
• Meeting in Minneapolis Lisa Dusseault

Thursday, 27 January 2005

• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 26 January 2005

• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? Julian Reschke
• lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? John Baumgarten

Tuesday, 25 January 2005

• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke

Monday, 24 January 2005

• RE: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• RE: ETags? Cox, Roger
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm

Sunday, 23 January 2005

• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Elias Sinderson

Saturday, 22 January 2005

• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 21 January 2005

• Re: ETags? Elias Sinderson
• Re: ETags? Elias Sinderson
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• RE: ETags? Jim Whitehead

Thursday, 20 January 2005

• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Brian Korver
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• Re: ETags? Brian Korver
• Please add bugzilla "products" for RFC-3744 and RFC-3253 Geoffrey M Clemm
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Elias Sinderson
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• [Bug 71] New: Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 19 January 2005

• RE: ETags? Jim Whitehead
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND Brian Korver
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND Julian Reschke
• Discovering bindings in BIND Joe Hildebrand
• RE: ETags? Jim Whitehead
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: ETags? Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: ETags? Lisa Dusseault
• Re: ETags? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification Julian Reschke
• Re: ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) Brian Korver
• Re: ETags? Brian Korver
• Re: ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) Julian Reschke
• RE: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification Jim Whitehead
• RE: ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) Jim Whitehead
• Re: ETags? Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) Brian Korver
• Re: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification Ted Hardie

Tuesday, 18 January 2005

• Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault
• RE: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Fay, Chuck
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Brian Korver
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Elias Sinderson
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Julian Reschke

Saturday, 15 January 2005

• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Geoffrey M Clemm

Friday, 14 January 2005

• Re: Goliath, MacOS X Client and WebCT Vista Brian Korver
• Goliath, MacOS X Client and WebCT Vista Frank Lowney
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: BIND issue 3.1_uuids (action item) Julian Reschke
• RE: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Fay, Chuck
• RE: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. Joe Hildebrand
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: BIND issue 3.1_uuids (action item) Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault
• BIND issue 3.1_uuids (action item) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Julian Reschke
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue Mike Lindsey

Thursday, 13 January 2005

• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue Julian Reschke

Friday, 14 January 2005

• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Neal Gafter
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Geoffrey M Clemm
• hello from Streamload Jim Whitehead
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. Lisa Dusseault

Thursday, 13 January 2005

• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue Lisa Dusseault
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue Mike Lindsey
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue Elias Sinderson
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue Julian Reschke
• mod_dav and ie web folders issue Mike Lindsey

Wednesday, 12 January 2005

• Re: WG Last call for BIND Joe Hildebrand
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Julian Reschke
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Joe Hildebrand
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Joe Hildebrand
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: WG Last call for BIND Julian Reschke
• WG Last call for BIND Joe Hildebrand

Wednesday, 5 January 2005

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 March 2005 02:24:08 UTC