- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:29:57 +0100
- To: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- CC: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Brian Korver wrote: > Right, that's what I believe it says too, but I think that may be > counter-intuitive for some implementers -- who may in fact miss > this text in 3.11 and to implement expecting that they can assume > it's the same entity. > ... I'm not sure why implementers who are going to miss a specific section in RFC2616 aren't going to miss other important sections in RFC2616, RFC2518 or BIND as well -- so I don't buy that as reason to repeat something that another spec (normatively referenced) already says. Have you actually *seen* implementers make that mistake? In which case a request for clarification should be added to the RFC2616 errata list. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 01:30:44 UTC