- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:47:51 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 ------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de 2005-02-03 15:47 ------- Looking at RFC2616's definition of both headers, I don't see any indication why they would behave differently. So, independantly of whether we want to say anything, this particular proposal seems to be technically incorrect. My interpretation of the discussion we had on the mailing list is that the only thing that can reliably be said is that DAV properties that are defined in terms of RFC2616 response headers MUST behave the way they are defined as per RFC2616, which - at the end of the day - isn't really interesting at all (thus, I believe, we shouldn't say anything at all). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:47:51 UTC