- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:47:43 +0100
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- CC: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Jamie Lokier wrote: > ... > If it's done, the behaviour of the server is unpredictable. ADDMEMBER > doesn't fix that. > ... You keep saying that :-) So are you saying that defining new methods never ever is the right approach, because there are broken servers out there? If that's the case, let's just agree that we disagree. > (Although it would shift the likelihood towards a simple failure > rather than an unwanted side effect. Is it worth creating a new > method just to change the likelihood of a behaviour when a CalDAV > client is pointed at the wrong URL?) ADDMEMBER is a generic method. It doesn't have anything specific to do with CalDAV except that it *could* be used with CalDAV. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:48:27 UTC