RE: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification from Jim Whitehead on 2005-01-19 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from January to March 2005)

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:08:00 -0800
To: "'webdav'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200501190108.j0J189VD025174@services.cse.ucsc.edu>

Moving locking issues into another draft doesn't reduce the complexity of
the locking issues; it just moves text. If an issue is contentious in
2518bis, it will still be contentious in 2518bis-lock. 

Moving locking to a separate document won't speed the overall process,
because approval of this document will still be gated on completion of the
rest of the 2518bis edits, to ensure there aren't inconsistencies.

Locking should not be split out from the rest of 2518bis. 

- Jim

Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 01:08:11 UTC