- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:25:18 +0100
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > I wish it were so easy to write short, clear specifications that could > be unambiguously understood and implemented. I wish features could be > orthogonal. Features *can* be orthogonal. Sometimes they aren't (in which case a spec needs to say something about it). The more orthogonal you make them, the simpler the specs and the interdependencies. > However, bindings together with existing WebDAV features, while mostly > orthogonal, have a few interesting, confusing or important interactions. > > This isn't an unlimited set of work, folks. All these issues have been > raised before this last call period (except maybe one?) and it isn't an > ever growing set. We're talking about maybe half a page of new text to > clarify important interactions to implementors, and then we're done and > we'll have a really good spec. At this point, unless you have a *specific* proposal for specification text, I don't really find this comment really helpful... Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2005 23:26:01 UTC