- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:48:54 +0100
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- CC: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > If there were a well-defined (and finite) number of such "guidances", > I could live with it (and it was on that basis that I reluctantly > agreed to adding the "guidance" text about locking). > > But as soon as we agree to one such "guidance", a new one is suggested. > I despair of ever getting the BIND protocol published if it is delayed > until it has become a complete "implementation guide". > > I noticed that yet another such request for "guidance text" has just > been posted to the > bug database [bug 71]. I also note that nothing in the "bug" has to > do with any of the methods or properties defined by the binding > specification, > but is about access control. > > I have nothing against asking for guidance from the mailing list, > but holding a specification hostage until all of your implementation > issues have been addressed by the mailing list seems a bit unreasonable. > > Cheers, > Geoff For the record: I completely agree with that statement. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 21:49:35 UTC