- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:55:21 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 ------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2005-01-28 09:55 ------- Well, in part it's a "cover our ass" kind of action to say that something is explicitly not dealt with. It tells reviewers (eg. the IESG) what is and isn't in scope, and if interactions with DeltaV aren't in scope, then the spec can still be considered to be complete. Also this kind of statement is a big warning sign to people implementing both DeltaV and Bind. It tells them to be careful, they're walking into uncharted territory and they really need to carefully consider each conclusion they draw from reading the two specs, because nobody's explained yet how they work together in the details. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 17:55:22 UTC