- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:46:39 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Feb 25, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > You are right, MKCOL isn't idempotent, nor is MOVE. I'll raise issues > against RFC2518bis, RFC3253bis, RFC3648bis and RFC3744bis so this > get's fixed in future revisions. Do you mean that MKCOL *is* idempotent, and MOVE isn't? Thanks! -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 22:46:43 UTC