Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00]

Jamie Lokier wrote:
>  ...
> And so, for ADDMEMBER to be useful, you need to specify it more
> tightly than "PUT except the created resource URI is selected
> differently".
> If you do that, it makes sense.  If you don't, then ADDMEMBER is no
> different from POST.
> ...

OK, to summarize: your point is that PUT doesn't have the strict 
semantics (that I claim it has). Let's just agree that we disagree here.

> That said, even if you do specify ADDMEMBER more tightly, I still
> don't see how the difference would benefit you.  You say it could be
> useful to an intermediary, but can you give a plausible example?

Did I?

Best regards, Julian

<green/>bytes GmbH -- -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:49:50 UTC