- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:48:59 +0100
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- CC: algermissen@acm.org, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Jamie Lokier wrote: > ... > And so, for ADDMEMBER to be useful, you need to specify it more > tightly than "PUT except the created resource URI is selected > differently". > > If you do that, it makes sense. If you don't, then ADDMEMBER is no > different from POST. > ... OK, to summarize: your point is that PUT doesn't have the strict semantics (that I claim it has). Let's just agree that we disagree here. > That said, even if you do specify ADDMEMBER more tightly, I still > don't see how the difference would benefit you. You say it could be > useful to an intermediary, but can you give a plausible example? Did I? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:49:50 UTC