- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:37:51 +0100
- To: John Baumgarten <jbaumgarten@apple.com>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
John Baumgarten wrote: > > All- > > I've searched through the mail archives and 2518 and 2518bis-06, so > forgive me if this is a well-known issue. > > After a lock-null has been converted to a either a collection or > "regular" resource via a MKCOL or PUT, respectively, should the > resulting resource still be locked? In RFC2518: yes. That's the whole point. In RFC2518bis: the concept doesn't exist anymore. LOCK to an unmapped URL creates an empty and locked (non-collection) resource. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 22:38:29 UTC