Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks.

Fay, Chuck wrote:
> I would like to revise and expand on some wording that I introduced in
> the first sentence, to make it clearer:
> 2.x UNLOCK and Bindings
> Due to the specific language used in section 8.11 of [RFC2518], it might
> be thought that an UNLOCK request to a locked resource would unlock just
> the particular binding expressed by the Request-URI, rather than the
> resource identified by that URI.  This is not the case, however.
> Section 6 of [RFC2518] clearly states that locks are on resources, not
> URIs, so the server MUST allow UNLOCK to be used to unlock a locked
> resource through any binding to that resource.  The authors of this
> specification anticipate and recommend that future revisions of
> [RFC2518] maintain this behavior.

It keeps improving :-).

Best regards, Julian

<green/>bytes GmbH -- -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 00:45:29 UTC