Re: Summary of "working group meeting"

On Mar 17, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

>> My vote is for the quota protocol, since we have at least two very
>> interested implementors who want to see this completed.
> That sounds good to me, also because the quota protocol is quite  
> simple.  Again, we need a couple reviews to finish this one off.    
> Jim Luther, are you still out there?  With your early involvement  
> in quota, it would be great to have a review now, even if there are  
> no design issues. (At this point, finding nits is also needed).   
> Anybody else?

Yes, I'm still lurking. I'll give the latest quota draft and Julian's  
issues at < 
2005JanMar/0194.html> another look.

- Jim

Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 01:12:56 UTC