- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:27:25 -0800
- To: <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:22 PM, Jim Whitehead wrote: > My personal feeling is that this working group needs firm direction > from its > chairs on what to work on next, and it also needs commitment to get > completed drafts through the approval process. I've volunteered to > work on > the bind specification to get it to RFC status. Beyond this, the most > constructive step is to determine which draft to work on next. Hi Jim, this is great. I appreciate your willingness to work on this and look forward to seeing your draft. The other thing we'll need to finish Bind is a couple of serious reviews. > > My vote is for the quota protocol, since we have at least two very > interested implementors who want to see this completed. That sounds good to me, also because the quota protocol is quite simple. Again, we need a couple reviews to finish this one off. Jim Luther, are you still out there? With your early involvement in quota, it would be great to have a review now, even if there are no design issues. (At this point, finding nits is also needed). Anybody else? Thanks, Lisa
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2005 18:28:41 UTC