- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:07:56 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Mark Nottingham wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> You are right, MKCOL isn't idempotent, nor is MOVE. I'll raise issues >> against RFC2518bis, RFC3253bis, RFC3648bis and RFC3744bis so this >> get's fixed in future revisions. > > > Do you mean that MKCOL *is* idempotent, and MOVE isn't? Yep, sorry. MKCOL is idempotent. -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 08:08:32 UTC