- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:48:18 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebrand@jabber.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I've limited myself to the role of reviewer on BIND because I wanted to do a bunch of technical and spec clarity reviews. Normally that's well within the scope of a chair and in fact expected of them, but it seemed to be causing some tension in this case so process stuff for BIND is all in Joe's hands. Lisa On Feb 25, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Julian Reschke wrote: >> OK, >> as announced one week ago, I have submitted the current draft text as >> version -11. As far as I can tell, all issues that have been raised >> during the working group last call should be closed according to the >> procedure outlined by Joe >> (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/ >> 0001.html>). >> Three additional issues were raised after last call. They have been >> answered, and there was no further discussion since (> 2 weeks ago). >> Also, they don't have any votes in the issue tracker, so they should >> be closed as well. >> Thus, it seems we're done WGLC-wise. The next step now is to submit >> this draft for publication as RFC, which will result in another last >> call in which possibly remaining issues can be raised. Joe, Lisa? > > Lisa, Joe, > > it would be nice if you could follow up on how to proceed. As far as I > can tell, we're done, and draft 11 should be sent to the IESG for > approval as Proposed Standard. > > What am I missing? > > > Best regards, Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 01:48:34 UTC