Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00]

I think it is also not clear if its a hop-to-hop or end-to-end header. 
So chances of getting it working in an uncontrolled environment are not 
good.

//Stefan

Am 17.02.2005 um 22:28 schrieb Julian Reschke:

>
> Helge Hess wrote:
>> On 17. Feb 2005, at 22:04 Uhr, Jim Whitehead wrote:
>>> 1) One problem clients currently encounter with PUT is determining 
>>> whether
>>> they have permission to write to a specific location. At present, a 
>>> client
>>> must submit a PUT (or ADDMEMBER) with the entire entity body, then 
>>> wait for
>>> the response, or the authentication challenge.
>> Isn't that already solved with Expect: 100-continue?
>> http://zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC2616/Output/chapter14.html#sub20
>
> Sort of. The problem is that it's extremely hard to implement using 
> the Java servlet API (but that's "just" an implementation issue...).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>

Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 08:26:30 UTC