Re: ETags?

I certainly agree with that.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 01/19/2005 07:24:54 PM:
> 
> Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> > 
> > I agree with Roy's rationale and conclusion, and support the
> > removal of the reference to live properties in section 2.6.
> 
> Just checking...:
> 
> for a server that does support both RFC3253 and BIND, the value of a 
> WebDAV property MUST NOT vary across bindings unless it's reported as a 
> live property through DAV:supported-live-property-set?
> 
> (That's something we all should be able to agree upon)