w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from January to March 2005 by author

Bernard Desruisseaux

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)

Brian Korver

• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Monday, 7 February)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: Goliath, MacOS X Client and WebCT Vista (Friday, 14 January)

bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu

• [Bug 80] New: Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Friday, 25 February)
• [Bug 79] New: PUT for collections rationale (Thursday, 24 February)
• [Bug 74] Remove UUID generation instructions (Sunday, 6 February)
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Friday, 4 February)
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Friday, 4 February)
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 78] Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 76] What event does creationdate refer to (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 77] Do Bind operations change the getlastmodified or getetag property values (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 78] New: Value of ETag and getlastmodified properties on multiple bindings (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 77] New: Do Bind operations change the getlastmodified or getetag property values (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 76] New: What event does creationdate refer to (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Bug 74] New: Remove UUID generation instructions (Sunday, 30 January)
• [Bug 72] Review references section (Sunday, 30 January)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Sunday, 30 January)
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used (Friday, 28 January)
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used (Friday, 28 January)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 28 January)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 28 January)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 28 January)
• [Bug 5] Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified (Friday, 28 January)
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used (Thursday, 20 January)
• [Bug 71] Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used (Thursday, 20 January)
• [Bug 71] New: Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is used (Thursday, 20 January)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Wednesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Wednesday, 19 January)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Thursday, 13 January)
• [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Thursday, 13 January)

Cox, Roger

• RE: ETags? (Monday, 24 January)

Elias Sinderson

• Re: Summary of "working group meeting", was: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: WG last call on BIND (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: ETags? (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Thursday, 13 January)

Fay, Chuck

• RE: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• RE: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Friday, 14 January)

Frank Lowney

• Goliath, MacOS X Client and WebCT Vista (Friday, 14 January)

Geoffrey M Clemm

• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: State of a lock (Sunday, 13 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: WG last call on BIND (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) (Monday, 31 January)
• Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) (Saturday, 29 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• RE: ETags? (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: ETags? (Monday, 24 January)
• Please add bugzilla "products" for RFC-3744 and RFC-3253 (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: BIND issue 3.1_uuids (action item) (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)

Heiko.Weber@softwareag.com

• Order of dead properties (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Question about DAV:getlastmodified property (Thursday, 17 February)

Helge Hess

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-11.txt (Friday, 18 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-11.txt (Thursday, 10 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-06.txt (Wednesday, 9 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Thursday, 20 January)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-10.txt (Wednesday, 5 January)

Jim Luther

• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" (Friday, 18 March)

Jim Whitehead

• RE: Review of quota-06 (Saturday, 19 March)
• RE: Review of quota-06 (Friday, 18 March)
• Moving forward on BIND (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: Working group moving forward? (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: Summary of "working group meeting" (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• On clarification text in specifications (Monday, 31 January)
• RE: ETags? (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) (Wednesday, 19 January)
• hello from Streamload (Friday, 14 January)

Joe Hildebrand

• Working group moving forward? (Thursday, 17 March)
• BIND and access control lists (Thursday, 3 February)
• Status of working group last call on BIND (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) (Sunday, 30 January)
• Discovering bindings in BIND (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)
• WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)

John Baumgarten

• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 26 January)

John Reese

• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Saturday, 29 January)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Working group moving forward? (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Review of quota-06 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Review of quota-06 (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" (Thursday, 17 March)
• Summary of "working group meeting", was: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Order of dead properties (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Order of dead properties (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: Meeting in Minneapolis (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: Content encoding and MS Word ... (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: Question on WebDAV usage from Web (Friday, 4 March)
• Idempotency in RFC3648, was: WebDav methods and idempotency (Sunday, 27 February)
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Question about DAV:getlastmodified property (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• draft-reschke-webdav-locking-07, was: State of a lock (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 15 February)
• State of a lock (Sunday, 13 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Defining extensions for the "Expect" header (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-11.txt (Thursday, 10 February)
• Review of quota-06, Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-06.txt (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: [Bug 74] New: Remove UUID generation instructions (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Thursday, 3 February)
• WG last call on BIND (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: Perils of "guidance" (was Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion?) (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Saturday, 29 January)
• Re: Clarifying text and spec completeness (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Microsoft releases a WebFolder client update, available for all platforms (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Fwd: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: lock-null's Still Locked after MKCOL or PUT conversion? (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: ETags? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: ETags? (Sunday, 23 January)
• Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: ETags? (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Discovering bindings in BIND (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (was: WG Last call for BIND) (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings in teract with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: BIND issue 3.1_uuids (action item) (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• BIND issue 3.1_uuids (action item) (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: WG Last call for BIND (Wednesday, 12 January)

Lisa Dusseault

• Minutes for WebDAV WG meeting March 10 2005 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Review of quota-06 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Summary of "working group meeting" (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Order of dead properties (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Order of dead properties (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposal for WebDAV WG meeting agenda for 62nd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Fwd: IESG Document Review Process Update (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Question about DAV:getlastmodified property (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: BIND and access control lists (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: Status of working group last call on BIND (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Fwd: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 28 January)
• Meeting in Minneapolis (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: ETags? (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Thursday, 13 January)

Mark Baker

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: WebDav methods and idempotency (Friday, 25 February)
• WebDav methods and idempotency (Friday, 25 February)

Mike Lindsey

• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Thursday, 13 January)
• mod_dav and ie web folders issue (Thursday, 13 January)

Neal Gafter

• Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks. (Friday, 14 January)

Parvathi K

• Re: Question on WebDAV usage from Web (Friday, 4 March)
• Question on WebDAV usage from Web (Thursday, 3 March)

Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com

• Content encoding and MS Word ... (Thursday, 17 February)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Clarifying text and spec completeness (Saturday, 29 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: ETags? (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: ETags? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: ETags? (Wednesday, 19 January)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt (Tuesday, 8 February)

Ted Hardie

• Re: Clarifying text and spec completeness (Saturday, 29 January)
• Clarifying text and spec completeness (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Creating a separate Locking-bis protocol specification (Wednesday, 19 January)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [Fwd: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00] (Thursday, 17 February)

王栋

• Hello, I am new here (Saturday, 26 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 March 2005 02:24:08 UTC