- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 21:43:11 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Hmm, that seems to be revising the semantics of PUT to be non-idempotent; doesn't seem like a good idea... On Feb 26, 2005, at 12:27 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > RFC3253 allows PUT and COPY (target resource) to be auto-versioned. > That is, everytime you PUT to a URI, you may be -- as a side effect -- > creating a new version (and the DeltaV live properties on the resource > will reflect this). Can we still consider this idempotent. RFC3253bis > should say something about this.. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 05:43:13 UTC