Monday, 30 June 2014
- Is the TAG structure harmful? [Was: Fwd: Forced Resignation]
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
Friday, 27 June 2014
- RE: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- RE: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
Thursday, 26 June 2014
Wednesday, 25 June 2014
Friday, 20 June 2014
Thursday, 19 June 2014
- Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- RE: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
Wednesday, 18 June 2014
- RE: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- w3process-ISSUE-102 (Notes aren't RF): Clarify in maturity levels that RF commitments only apply to REC. [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- w3process-ISSUE-101 (better diagrams): Improve the diagrams in the Process document
Tuesday, 17 June 2014
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: CG decision making
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- RE: CG decision making
Monday, 16 June 2014
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- RE: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- RE: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
- Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
Sunday, 15 June 2014
Friday, 13 June 2014
Thursday, 12 June 2014
- Re: CG decision making
- Re: CG decision making
- Re: CG decision making
- Re: On Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"
- CG decision making
- w3process-ISSUE-100 (PR in exclusion period): Should it be possible to publish a pr before a call for exclusion ends [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- w3process-ISSUE-99 (patent policy timelines): Can we shorten the timelines required by the patent policy [Patent Policy]
Wednesday, 11 June 2014
- Re: On Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- On Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"
- split Process Doc maintenance from AB Advisory Role
- w3process-ISSUE-98 (meeting rules): What are requirements for meetings [Process Document]
Tuesday, 10 June 2014
Monday, 9 June 2014
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Help re: Poll/interviews
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
Sunday, 8 June 2014
- RE: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Call for Feedback on Proposals to change Advisory Board Structure
- AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
Saturday, 7 June 2014
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
Friday, 6 June 2014
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
Thursday, 5 June 2014
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- How we work Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Disclosure and information proposal
- Voting and W3C level of engagement
- RE: Disclosure and information proposal
- RE: Disclosure and information proposal
Wednesday, 4 June 2014
- RE: Disclosure and information proposal
- RE: Disclosure and information proposal
- Disclosure and information proposal
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- How to reach AC Newbies and why is there such a Large "Silent Majority"? [Was: Re: Don't disclose election results]
- w3process-ISSUE-97 (AB-Name): Is using the term "Board" in "Advisory Board" really accurate and representative? [Advisory Board]
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
Tuesday, 3 June 2014
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Don't disclose election results (was: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution)
- Re: Don't disclose election results (was: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution)
- Re: Don't disclose election results (was: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution)
- RE: Don't disclose election results
- Re: Don't disclose election results
- Don't disclose election results (was: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution)
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: general thanks
Monday, 2 June 2014
- general thanks
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- RE: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution
- Re: Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Re: Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Re: Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Re: Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Re: Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Disclosing election results (was Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting")
- Re: Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"
- comparing chapter 7 draft and old version
- Result Re: Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"