- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:19:12 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 09/06/2014 14:58, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: >> What is your definition of `notable` here? Is 12 or 18 or 24 ok? > > The bigger it gets, the worse the problem of a large AB gets. It's not pure mathematics, it's social interactions. I don't think the AB should get any > bigger. I don't understand this point of view at all. Out of 384 ACs, ˜30 are active on W3C operations and roughly 20 are able to bring interesting data, suggestions, proposals, doc editorship and more - let's call that important contributions - to the AB. It seems to me our AB selection system has only one immediate impact: we're not using the people left outside of the AB as efficiently as we could. </Daniel>
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 19:19:36 UTC