- From: Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:49:46 +0000
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
It's one thing for candidates to be privately informed, IF they want to know. It's another thing for that information to be made public. > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Glazman [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:42 AM > To: public-w3process@w3.org > Subject: Re: Don't disclose election results > > On 03/06/2014 18:18, Robin Berjon wrote: > > Deanonymising might have made them feel > > obliged to vote for that person. Sure enough a politician getting trounced > can be tough, but you're trounced mostly by total strangers. If you've been > > a part of this community and you get five votes, you'll feel trounced by > your friends. > > I think it is out of question to "deanonymize" votes. But I still > think each candidate has the right to know how many votes he/she got > and out of how many. > > > So, please, let's not make the results transparent. There's plenty of > *other* things we need to make the election more open. The first of them is > that > > non-AC candidates should be subscribed to the AC lists for the duration of > the campaign. > > Samsung's AB candidate was in that case, and I pinged IanJ to have > him subscribed. FWIW, I think Huawei's AC-Rep posted their candidate's > statement to the AC Forum because he was in that case too. > > So I agree 100% with that. > > </Daniel> > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 16:50:18 UTC