- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:57:58 -0400
- To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
To be clear, I think having the formal AB of a reasonable limited size — up to about a dozen — with the ability to invite as needed, is the right arrangement (i.e. I would not change anything). On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:24 , Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/6/14 4:32 PM, David Singer wrote: >> I think in general, once over a minimum size, the efficacy of a committee (and I mean committee, not working group etc.) is inversely proportional to size. > > (If anyone has any _real_ data here, please provide the link(s)). > >> For example, for classic boards, I think once you are over about a dozen, efficacy drops sharply. > > David - do you support increasing the AB size? If so, what size do you recommend/propose? > >> There are many factors at play: it takes longer to listen to everyone (and one has to, even if people repeat things already said), > > I don't see that having to listen to everyone is necessarily a `bad thing`. > > -Thanks, AB > > David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 18:58:28 UTC